COMPELLE
See it work

You have a decision. Get a verdict.

Bring the question you actually need answered. Ask one model and you get a tidy, balanced list, then you are left to make the call. It cannot tell you which arguments survive when a hostile opponent attacks them, or how settled the question really is.

Compelle argues your question to a verdict: different model families take each side, then an independent panel of judges, from different labs, votes on who carried it. Every example below puts the one-model list next to the full Compelle answer. Look at the verdicts and the splits. That is the part you can only get by making them fight.

1 · Different minds
Heterogeneous debaters

Pro and Con run on models from different labs, so each side surfaces arguments the other would never raise on its own.

2 · A panel that can disagree
Independent judges

Five judges from different labs vote. A 5-0 means settled. A 3-2 means genuinely contested, and you see exactly who broke which way.

3 · What survived
Adversarial analysis

The breakdown quotes the exact line that swung the vote and names what held up under rebuttal, grounded in the transcript.

✦ ✦ ✦

Four real runs

Nothing here is scripted. These are real model debates, not hand-written examples. Click any one to see the single-model baseline next to the full Compelle debate, the panel vote, and the breakdown.

DebateMost contested
“Remote work makes software engineering teams more productive.”
The closest call in the gallery. Five independent judges, and they nearly split down the middle. See the one quote in turn four that tipped it.
See the breakdown →
Debate
“Open-source AI is safer for humanity than closed, proprietary AI.”
A strong consensus, but not a clean sweep. One judge dissented. The breakdown shows what the holdout found convincing that the others did not.
See the breakdown →
Debate
“Bitcoin is a better long-term store of value than gold.”
Con carried it, but read the transcript: the arguments that survived rebuttal are not the ones a single tidy pros-and-cons list would have led with.
See the breakdown →
TournamentBracket
“For most people, buying a home is a better financial decision than renting long-term.”
The biggest money decision most people make. A field of debaters argued it both ways across six games, each scored by the panel. See which side the field actually lands on once every case is pushed to its limit, and how close it really is.
See the verdict →

Now put your own question in the arena

Commission a custom debate or a full tournament on any motion that matters to you. Choose the models, get the transcript, the panel vote, and the breakdown delivered to you.

Run a debate →